Skip to main content
Home Shared Reality
Toggle menu

User menu

  • About
    • About
    • Methods
    • The Team
  • Challenge campaigns
    • The latest campaigns
    • Introducing the challenge campaign
    • Create a challenge
  • Argument maps
    • Featured argument maps
    • Latest argument maps
    • Introducing the argument map
    • For the Novice
  • Participate
  • Log in
  • Sign up

Alberto Luperton

Primary tabs

  • View(active tab)
Twitter handle: 
@albertoluperon

About

Editor, Law and Crime

URLs

Muck Rack
Law and Crime

References where this invitee is a Claimant

Perspective Date asserted The specific claim Source Claimants Claimants' Organizations Reporters Publisher Reference
Pro
11/15/19

As Law&Crime pointed out before, the impeachment inquiry doesn’t follow the normal set of rules.

“Only the chair and ranking minority member, or [an Intelligence Committee] employee if yielded to by the chair or ranking minority member, may question witnesses during such periods of questioning,” stated House Resolution 660.

That means the following: Chairman Schiff could make his opening statement and question the witness, then yield to House Democrats’ counsel Daniel Goldman for questioning; Ranking Member Nunes could make his opening statement and question the witness, then yield to House GOP counsel Steve Castor for questioning. After the brief Stefanik controversy played out, Nunes yielded to Castor and Castor questioned the witness. The impeachment inquiry rules say committee members, like Stefanik, can ask their questions later on.

lawandcrime.com
Alberto Luperton
Law and Crime
[none]
Law and Crime
[link]
"How do I know I'm right? I find the smartest people who disagree with me and I try to understand their perspectives." — Ray Dalio Shared Reality is damage control for disinformation

Copyright © 2021 Shared Reality Solutions

  • The Basics
  • Arguing on Shared Reality
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Contact