Skip to main content
Home Shared Reality
Toggle menu

User menu

  • About
    • About
    • Methods
    • The Team
  • Challenge campaigns
    • The latest campaigns
    • Introducing the challenge campaign
    • Create a challenge
  • Argument maps
    • Featured argument maps
    • Latest argument maps
    • Introducing the argument map
    • For the Novice
  • Participate
  • Log in
  • Sign up

References for this node

Primary tabs

  • View
  • Challenges
  • References(active tab)
  • Ratings
A reference's perspective is generally either supportive of ("Pro") or in opposition to ("Con") a claim or idea.
Perspective Date asserted The specific claim Source Claimants Claimants' Organizations Reporters Publisher Reference
Con
11/15/19
REP. ELISE STEFANIK: “So, this was day two of an abject failure of Adam Schiff and his regime of secrecy. As we saw today, he is making up the rules as he goes. He did not let Republicans put forth any unanimous consents, he did not let us control our own time, Republican members time. I think I was interrupted about six times throughout the hearing. So this is just more of the ridiculous abuse of power that we’re seeing from Adam Schiff.”
www.gop.gov
House Republicans
[none] [none] [none] [link]
Pro
11/24/19
House Intelligence Committee ranking member Devin Nunes (R-Calif.) tried to turn the microphone over to Stefanik rather than GOP counsel. The move wasn't in accordance with the House impeachment proceedings' hearing rules
thehill.com
Marty Johnson
[none] [none]
The Hill
[link]
Pro
11/15/19
NUNES intentionally violates the impeachment inquiry rules by yielding to STEFANIK. They know this violates the process set out for the impeachment inquiry and then pretend to be shocked when Schiff gavels them down.
twitter.com
Kyle Cheney
[none] [none] [none] [link]
Pro
11/15/19

Or it's against the rules passed before this began. Chair +rankers + lawyers, then members. It was a stunt.

twitter.com
Jackie Kucinich
[none] [none] [none] [link]
Pro
11/15/19

In reality, this entire maneuver by the Republicans violated the rules of procedure that had been established for these hearings.

www.mediamatters.org
Eric Kleefeld
Media Matters for America
[none]
Media Matters for America
[link]
Pro
11/15/19

Schiff explained to Nunes that under the resolution that the House passed two weeks ago laying out procedures for the impeachment inquiry, the ranking member—like the chairman himself, on his own turn—could only use his 45-minute period for his own questioning or to yield to his staff counsel.

slate.com
Jim Newell
Slate
[none]
Slate
[link]
Pro
11/15/19

As Law&Crime pointed out before, the impeachment inquiry doesn’t follow the normal set of rules.

“Only the chair and ranking minority member, or [an Intelligence Committee] employee if yielded to by the chair or ranking minority member, may question witnesses during such periods of questioning,” stated House Resolution 660.

That means the following: Chairman Schiff could make his opening statement and question the witness, then yield to House Democrats’ counsel Daniel Goldman for questioning; Ranking Member Nunes could make his opening statement and question the witness, then yield to House GOP counsel Steve Castor for questioning. After the brief Stefanik controversy played out, Nunes yielded to Castor and Castor questioned the witness. The impeachment inquiry rules say committee members, like Stefanik, can ask their questions later on.

lawandcrime.com
Alberto Luperton
Law and Crime
[none]
Law and Crime
[link]
Pro
11/17/19

But Schiff was correct, and the Republicans were wrong. Under the resolution passed by the House two weeks earlier, at that point in the proceedings the chair and the ranking minority member of the committee (i.e., Schiff and Nunes) could use their allotted 45 minutes to either yield to staff counsel or pose questions themselves, but not yield time to “whoever they wish[ed].”

www.snopes.com
David Mikkelson
Snopes
[none]
Snopes
[link]
Pro
11/16/19

Rules for the impeachment hearing allow the committee chairman and ranking member to only cede minutes to committee staff counsel.

dailygazette.com
Jason Subik
The Daily Gazette
[none]
The Daily Gazette
[link]
Pro
11/18/19

Early in the afternoon, Rep. Devin Nunes (Calif.), the Republican ranking member of the intelligence committee, attempted to yield some of his time to Stefanik. This attempt, however, violated a House resolution: Only ranking members and their staff counsel were allowed to speak at that moment.

www.washingtonpost.com
Monica Hesse
[none] [none]
The Washington Post
[link]
Pro
11/15/19

House Intelligence Committee Republicans attempted to defy the rules

www.axios.com
Axios
[none] [none]
Axios
[link]
Pro
11/15/19

The first time Rep. Devin Nunes tried to yield his time for questioning former U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine Marie Yovanovitch to North Country Congresswoman Elise Stefanik Friday, House Intelligence Committee Chair Adam Schiff blocked the move.

That is because it would have violated the rules

www.pressrepublican.com
Cara Chapman
Press-Republican
[none]
Press-Republican
[link]
Pro
11/15/19

Schiff was right about the rules

www.vox.com
Aaron Rupar
Vox
[none] [none] [link]
Pro
11/15/19

Stefanik again engaged in theatrics later in the hearing, forcing Schiff to gavel down her attempt to break the rules of the hearing and ask questions of the witness before it was her turn.

autos.yahoo.com
Jon Ward
Yahoo! News
[none]
Yahoo! News
[link]
The ultimate truth machine Shared Reality is damage control for disinformation

Copyright © 2021 Shared Reality Solutions

  • The Basics
  • Arguing on Shared Reality
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Contact