Skip to main content
Home Shared Reality
Toggle menu

User menu

  • About
    • About
    • Methods
    • The Team
  • Challenge campaigns
    • The latest campaigns
    • Introducing the challenge campaign
    • Create a challenge
  • Argument maps
    • Featured argument maps
    • Latest argument maps
    • Introducing the argument map
    • For the Novice
  • Participate
  • Log in
  • Sign up

Bret Weinstein claims that meta-analyses correct for faulty studies included in their assessments

Primary tabs

  • View(active tab)
Submitted by Shared Reality logo james on Thu, 08/05/2021 - 18:18

The specific snippet

large RCTs amplify systematic error in addition to signal, whereas meta-analysis amplifies signal, and corrects for error

The node

[link] True or False: Meta-analyses correct for faulty individual studies

Perspective

Pro

URL

https://twitter.com/BretWeinstein/status/1415835355937312771

Claimants

Bret Weinstein

Date asserted

Thursday, July 15, 2021

Date accessed

Thursday, August 5, 2021 - 18:13

Files

Image icon Bret Weinstein claiming that meta-analyses correct for included faulty studies
"Anyone who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities." — Voltaire Shared Reality is damage control for disinformation

Copyright © 2021 Shared Reality Solutions

  • The Basics
  • Arguing on Shared Reality
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Contact