Skip to main content
Home Shared Reality
Toggle menu

User menu

  • About
    • About
    • Methods
    • The Team
  • Challenge campaigns
    • The latest campaigns
    • Introducing the challenge campaign
    • Create a challenge
  • Argument maps
    • Featured argument maps
    • Latest argument maps
    • Introducing the argument map
    • For the Novice
  • Participate
  • Log in
  • Sign up

Graham Walker, MD, claims that Bret Weinstein's claim about meta-analyses is wrong

Primary tabs

  • View(active tab)
Submitted by Shared Reality logo james on Fri, 08/06/2021 - 07:15

The specific snippet

I think I saw Bret Weinstein today even saying, um... you know, meta-analysis can address any issues with low quality trials. It doesn't work that way. It's "garbage in, garbage out." You can't take really poor quality data, um, from a poor quality study and add that all together and make good quality data.

The node

[link] True or False: Meta-analyses correct for faulty individual studies

Perspective

Con

URL

https://www.bitchute.com/video/lQVt43uUfCKc/

Claimants

Graham Walker, MD

Date asserted

Wednesday, August 4, 2021

Reporters

David Fuller

Publisher

Rebel Wisdom

Date accessed

Friday, August 6, 2021 - 07:10

Files

File Graham Walker on Bret Weinstein being wrong about garbage in garbage out relative to meta-analyses
Keeping Everyone on the Same Page Shared Reality is damage control for disinformation

Copyright © 2021 Shared Reality Solutions

  • The Basics
  • Arguing on Shared Reality
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Contact